Robertson Eds. Multirater assessment of creative contributions to team projects in organizations. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology , 19 , — Interactive effects of growth need strength, work context, and job complexity on self-reported creative performance. Academy of Management Journal , 52 , — Ratings of organizational citizenship behavior: Does the source make a difference?
Human Resource Management Review , 10 1 , 97 — Because of these opposing views, we examined whether differences exist between resources and performance relationships when performance is rated using either self, other, or objective performance ratings. Research Question 5: Is there a difference in the strength of the relationship between resources and self-reported, other-reported, and objective performance?
We conducted a meta-analysis to answer Research Questions 2—5. In this section, we first describe the literature search and then the analytical methods applied in the meta-analysis. As existing research frameworks such as the JD-R model Demerouti et al. Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress.
American Psychologist , 44 , — We focused on high-impact journals in anticipation that articles with rigorous and valid methods and designs are more likely published in such journals. Social enterprises as hybrid organizations: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews , 16 , — We selected relevant high-impact journals from the Management and Applied Psychology lists. We selected relevant highly ranked journals from the HRM and psychology lists.
In total, 23 journals were searched. We first identified papers that included both performance and well-being measures according to our definitions above. We then identified whether any antecedents could be classified as resources. We performed a manual and electronic search of all selected journals to identify published articles where the potential impact of workplace resources on employee well-being and organisational performance has been examined simultaneously.
For example, if a study on team climate and well-being among teleworkers and a study on team climate and performance among nurses revealed a relationship with performance, but not well-being, we cannot ascertain whether this outcome are due to the different occupational contexts: We cannot not delineate whether team climate has little importance for well-being universally or only among people who mostly work on their own or whether team climate is universally linked to performance, but not well-being between team climate and performance, but not well-being, we cannot ascertain whether these outcomes are due to the different occupational contexts: we cannot delineate whether team climate has little importance for well-being among people who mostly work on their own or whether team climate is universally linked to performance, but not well-being.
To reflect the recent growth in interest of researchers and practitioners on i the importance of both employee well-being and organisational performance, and ii increased theoretical knowledge about workplace resources, we focused on empirical studies published between and December At first, we manually searched journals from to the end of , but prior to submission, we updated our search to include issues up to the end of We also included papers published online first.
The vast majority of papers identified were published after One rater identified papers by searching through the journals and identifying papers that included resources, employee well-being, and performance. A second rater reviewed the selected papers to ensure they all included at least one workplace resource and both employee well-being and performance outcomes. Consensus was reached through discussion between the raters, and any discrepancies were cross-checked by a third rater and resolved through discussion. One rater classified the resources into the four categories and these were checked by a second rater.
Again, any discrepancies were resolved through discussion. Full information on the literature search can be obtained upon request from the authors. We focused on empirical, quantitative studies that included correlation coefficients between a workplace resource and well-being and performance.
e-book Steps To Physical and Financial Well-Being
First, the study had to be published in a high-impact journal. Second, the study had to provide a zero-order correlation between a resource and any potential outcome. Third, in order to calculate the sample size, the study had to include the sample size. We excluded resources outside of work e. Emotional strain and organizational citizenship behaviours: A meta-analysis and review.
We also excluded the grey literature, that is, non-commercial and non-academic literature such as dissertations, conference papers, and unpublished articles, as these are not usually subjected to robust and stringent editorial processes.
The 4 Facets of Well-being | Ollis/Akers/Arney
Finally, books and book chapters were excluded as they do not often undergo the same rigorous review procedure as applied in high-impact journals. Comprehensive meta-analysis Version 2. Englewood , NJ : Biostat. In contrast to some other meta-analytic methods, such as the Hunter and Schmidt Hobfoll, S. Inverse-variance weighting is a method of aggregating two or more random variables, where each random variable is weighted in inverse proportion to its variance in order to minimise the variance of the weighted average.
Financial wellness awareness: A step closer to achieve Millennium Development Goals for Pakistan
Fixed effects vs. The Q within statistic was used to assess the heterogeneity of studies. A significant Q within value rejects the null hypothesis of homogeneity. An I 2 statistic was computed as an indicator of heterogeneity in percentages. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ , , — As considerable heterogeneity was found in our analyses, we calculated the pooled mean effect size using the random effects model.
Random effects models are recommended when accumulating data from a series of studies where the effect size is assumed to vary from one study to the next, and where it is unlikely that the studies are functionally equivalent Borenstein et al.
An introduction to meta-analysis for psychotherapy outcome research. Psychotherapy Research , 19 , — Under the random effects model, two levels of sampling and two sources of error are taken into consideration. First, the true effect sizes are distributed about the mean with a variance that reflects the actual distribution of the true effects about their mean.
Second, the observed effect for any given effect size will be distributed about that effect size with a variance that depends primarily on the sample size for that study. Therefore, in assigning weights to estimate the mean, one needs to deal with both sources of sampling error, that is, within studies and between studies Borenstein et al. Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester : Wiley. This sensitivity analysis provides average estimates for a given relationship by running a series of analyses where the overall effect size is re-estimated by removing one study in each successive analysis.
That is, in the first analysis, all studies except the first are included. In the second analysis, all studies except the second are included, and so on. It is a potential shortcoming of meta-analyses that overall effect sizes can be overestimated due to a publication bias in favour of significant findings. The procedure proposed by Hedges and Olkin Hedges, L.
Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando , FL : Academic Press. The presence of a moderator is indicated by a statistically significant Q Between , which suggests a difference between the mean effect sizes across groups. The literature search resulted in 84 quantitative studies covering at least one level of workplace resources. Thirty-four studies covered individual resources, 17 examined group-level resources, 31 studied leader resources, and 48 included organisational resources. The majority of studies 45 explored resources at only 1 of the IGLO levels, 27 studies explored resources at 2 levels, and 8 studies included resources at 3 levels.
- Your employee’s financial well-being IS your business. And here’s why.
- Distance Learning: Information Access and Services for Virtual Users (Reference Librarian);
- Main navigation.
- The Best Lunch and Learn Ideas for Employee Well-Being.
- Perché non disegni il Paradiso? (Il filo azzurro) (Italian Edition)!
- Related Posts.
- In the Black: 1966!
Only 4 of the included studies examined resources at all 4 levels. Human, social, and now positive psychological capital management: Investing in people for competitive advantage. Organizational Dynamics , 33 , — Four studies examined all four components of PsyCap, whereas self-efficacy on its own was examined in seven studies.
Hope and optimism were each explored in one study. Resilience was explored in two studies, but in one study as a group-level construct.
Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review , 26 , — The group-level resources were most often studied as social support seven studies , the fit between the group and the person two studies , and characteristics related to the team such as team learning or team climate; two studies. Job crafting was also explored in one study as a group-level construct. Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader member exchange LMX theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying multi-level multi-domain perspective.
The Leadership Quarterly , 6 , — Transformational leadership. Mahwah , NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum. At the organisational level, 15 studies examined autonomy. HR practices as a cluster were examined in four studies. Eight studies examined one or more specific elements of HR practices such as compensation-based schemes four studies , training three studies , career supporting activities two studies , and performance appraisals one study.
Eight studies focused on POS and four studies examined the fit between the person and the organisation.
101 Wellness Tips
Weighted average relationships between the resources and the summary indicators of well-being and performance as estimated with a random effects model are displayed in Table 1. Answering Research Question 2, 30, respondents and 91 independent estimates gave an average correlation of. It showed no ineligible impact of any study. Altogether 18 missing studies were identified to the right of the mean.
This shifted the point estimate to. Following the recommendations for interpretations by Sterne et al. Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ , , d Funnel plots are available upon request from the first author.
Workplace resources to improve both employee well-being and performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis All authors Karina Nielsen , Morten B.
Overall relationships between resources, well-being, and performance random effects model. CSV Display Table.
- The Canterbury Tales?
- Dos And Dont's Of Marital Separation.
- Xenos: A Novel;
- Spiritual Information: 100 Perspectives on Science and Religion.
- Study for Left Hand Alone.
Also, in answer to Research Question 2 and based on 29, respondents and 92 independent estimates, the analysis of relationships between resources and performance yielded an average correlation of. A funnel plot showed that the studies were more or less equally distributed around the mean. In summary, the answers to our first and second research questions were that a resources had mostly been studied at the organisational level, while group-level resources have received the least attention in relation to both employee well-being and performance and b resources were significantly related to both well-being and performance.
Our third research question was related to the strength of the relationships between workplace resources at the four levels and well-being and performance: Are resources at some levels more strongly related to these outcomes than resources at other levels? In order to determine the impact of the level of resource IGLO on correlations between resources and outcomes, a moderation analysis was conducted to examine average weighted correlations at the four different levels. The findings on well-being are presented in Table 2 , whereas the findings on performance are displayed in Table 3.